The Biological Jew ,by, Eustace Mullins

.
.
.

.
.
. Forward:

THE PARASITE

Most of us think of a parasite as something distasteful, whose role in life is to feed at the
expense of someone else. As a result, the term, when applied to humans, is always one of disgust. In the animal and plant kingdoms, also, the parasite is universally disliked. The Oxford
English Dictionary (1933) defines the term.

“Parasite–1. One who eats at the table, or at the expense of, another; always an opprobrious application.

2. Biol. An animal or plant which lives in or upon another organism (technically called its host) and draws its nutriment directly from it.

3. (fig.) a person whose part or action resembles that of an animal parasite.”

This we find that a parasite is one who is disliked, who feeds at the expense of another, and who lives in or upon another organism which is called the host. We also find that the term can be applied to a person whose life follows the classic life pattern of the parasite. Now, in the study of mankind, we find that there is one group or classification of persons who appear persistently in the records of the great civilizations. They are always disliked, yet
they remain in the midst of the people who dislike them, and if they are driven out, they insist upon returning, no matter at what cost to themselves. We also find that they always manage to live at the expense of others.
.
.
THE ABILITY TO MODIFY

This is an important characteristic of the parasitic group in the history of mankind. It has exhibited an amazing ability to change or to modify itself in order to achieve its parasitic goal. It has developed extremely refined techniques for remaining upon the host, and sophisticated methods of continuing to feed at the hosts expense. It has adopted many guises, and it has shown a tremendous amount of adaptability for appearing in various forms, in order to remain in place.
.
.
KNOWN AS THE JEWS

This group, as the reader may have already surmised from his own studies, is known
throughout history as the Jews. Prior to the present study, human individuals or groups living at the expense of others were often called parasites, but this term was used purely in a sociological sense, without any biological point of reference. Plantation owners were said to be parasites because they lived at the expense of their slaves, aristocrats were said to be parasites because they lived at the expense of the masses, armies were said to be parasites because they lived at the expense of the workers.
.
.
.
RIP E.M.
.
.
.
ENJ:)Y
.
.
.